<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.1-alpha2" -->
<rss version="2.0" 
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Explaining Cocoa</title>
	<link>http://www.stuffonfire.com/2007/01/23/explaining-cocoa/</link>
	<description>don't you worry about blank, let me worry about blank</description>
	<pubDate>Tue, 06 Jan 2009 13:52:47 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.1-alpha2</generator>

	<item>
		<title>by: Remi</title>
		<link>http://www.stuffonfire.com/2007/01/23/explaining-cocoa/#comment-7162</link>
		<pubDate>Sun, 04 Mar 2007 01:35:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.stuffonfire.com/2007/01/23/explaining-cocoa/#comment-7162</guid>
					<description>Considering I code in both, among other languages/environments, I can totally agree. Don't get me wrong, in a lot of ways, the C# language is actually a decent thing... it made a lot of improvements over Java, but it's still too verbose... Python is much nicer. Obj-C runs much faster and while it's a little harder to get the hang of, all said and done, there is a definite level of elegance that .Net just can't touch. And the fact that you don't have to deal with rebooting, etc. is great.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Considering I code in both, among other languages/environments, I can totally agree. Don&#8217;t get me wrong, in a lot of ways, the C# language is actually a decent thing&#8230; it made a lot of improvements over Java, but it&#8217;s still too verbose&#8230; Python is much nicer. Obj-C runs much faster and while it&#8217;s a little harder to get the hang of, all said and done, there is a definite level of elegance that .Net just can&#8217;t touch. And the fact that you don&#8217;t have to deal with rebooting, etc. is great.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Grady</title>
		<link>http://www.stuffonfire.com/2007/01/23/explaining-cocoa/#comment-6880</link>
		<pubDate>Sun, 25 Feb 2007 18:14:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.stuffonfire.com/2007/01/23/explaining-cocoa/#comment-6880</guid>
					<description>For great justice.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>For great justice.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: l0ne</title>
		<link>http://www.stuffonfire.com/2007/01/23/explaining-cocoa/#comment-6516</link>
		<pubDate>Sun, 18 Feb 2007 14:14:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.stuffonfire.com/2007/01/23/explaining-cocoa/#comment-6516</guid>
					<description>Amen to that!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Amen to that!
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: cahier lukhnos &#187; Blog Archive &#187; 這個描述實在太超過了</title>
		<link>http://www.stuffonfire.com/2007/01/23/explaining-cocoa/#comment-5273</link>
		<pubDate>Sun, 28 Jan 2007 18:39:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.stuffonfire.com/2007/01/23/explaining-cocoa/#comment-5273</guid>
					<description>[...] 有人這麼形容用Cocoa寫程式的感覺：  It’s as though you have .NET 3 on every machine, only it’s been shipping since ‘99, and you program in something like Smalltalk, only it’s fast, and in your installer, you can replace files without having to reboot. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] 有人這麼形容用Cocoa寫程式的感覺：  It’s as though you have .NET 3 on every machine, only it’s been shipping since ‘99, and you program in something like Smalltalk, only it’s fast, and in your installer, you can replace files without having to reboot. [&#8230;]
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: patc</title>
		<link>http://www.stuffonfire.com/2007/01/23/explaining-cocoa/#comment-4938</link>
		<pubDate>Tue, 23 Jan 2007 08:13:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.stuffonfire.com/2007/01/23/explaining-cocoa/#comment-4938</guid>
					<description>word to that.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>word to that.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
</channel>
</rss>
